I have a lot to say about Global Warming today, so let's dive right into it:

1. New Government Committee for Global Warming

AP Story on new Global Warming committee

This big ass post all started because of reading the recent news that the Dems in the House have decided to form a committee for the express purpose of Global Warming. The official name of the committee is "The Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming". What the f@#! does "energy independence" and "global warming" have to do with each other?!? As a matter of fact, with political correctness the way it is now-a-days, they are polar opposites. The more we put limitations on ourselves for so-called Global Warming, the more other nations without these limitations will produce cheaper oil and energy, and thus the more dependant we will become on these sources of energy. Dumbasses...

In addition to just being a stoopid, oxymoronic committee, it's pulling money away from the Ethics committee. I guess global warming is "the greatest challenge of our time", even though the Dems had promised to clean the "culture of corruption" in Washington. But you know, ethics just aren't that important.

But the worst is not only does it take money away from a smart committee (I can tell you enforcing ethics in Washington is no easy task) but this entire committee is a waste of tax payers money. Why? Because the Government has already spoken on Global Warming! Check out my old Feb 7th post about a press release I discovered from the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works. This spells out many issues on Global Warming and the committee does a good job on it. Why do we need even more people wasting time and money over this silly hype?!?

2. Censorship of Global Warming Debate

Want more proof that Global Warming is political and not scientific? Go no further than this article I found from the UK's Telegraph about leading science journals censoring the debate on Global Warming! Classic tactics on the left. Debate this, everything rhetoric they spew out is fact, and if you challenge you're either called names ("denier" anyone?) or censored. Read this excerpt:

"Dr Naomi Oreskes analysed almost 1,000 papers on the subject published since the early 1990s, and concluded that 75 per cent of them either explicitly or implicitly backed the consensus view, while none directly dissented from it. [This] study is now routinely cited by those demanding action on climate change, including the Royal Society and Prof Sir David King, the Government's chief scientific adviser [and Al Gore]. However, her unequivocal conclusions immediately raised suspicions among other academics, who knew of many papers that dissented from the pro-global warming line.

They included Dr Benny Peiser, a senior lecturer in the science faculty at Liverpool John Moores University, who decided to conduct his own analysis of the same set of 1,000 documents - and concluded that only one third backed the consensus view, while only one per cent did so explicitly." (emphasis added)

Remember, most pundits don't think it's real science if it hasn't been published in some kind of scientific journal. However, if these so-called scientific journals continue to reject legitimate papers questioning Global Warming, then they are eschewing the real research being done. That's one reason this is so frustrating. Those who have actually researched Global Warming know how much of this is bogus, but since little gets published, people don't take us seriously and call us "Deniers".

3. Sports Illustrated Endorses Global Warming

Sports Illustrated Global Warming article

The latest issue of Sports Illustrated has decided to stop worry about sports and start worrying about political garbage. Global Warming has nothing to do with how any particular team is performing, and yet a lengthy article is devoted to it, spreading the lies that this is "fact" instead of "theories" (shaky, unfounded theories at best).

I think it's highly ironic that the sport they try to highlight being affected by Global Warming is quickly becoming the least cared about sport in America...

4. February's Average Temperature = LOW!

NOAA's February 2007 Report

Looking at hard facts in the face of Global Warming is always fun. The National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration's February 2007 report shows that it was 1.8 F cool than the 20th Century! Where's Global Warming now, be-yotch!

5. The Misunderstood Universe, kick-ass Global Warming site

http://www.misunderstooduniverse.com/index.htm

In my recent perusal of the web finding information on Global Warming, I stumbled across this little nugget. It contains quite a bit of detail about Global Warming and the crap that it is. My favorite tidbit though has got to be it's article "Global Warming Benefits - You may well like it!" It details how civilization has always progressed faster when the climate was warmer. Winters are safer, agriculture thrives, and that allows for smarter brains.

6. Canadians given the Final Word on Global Warming

On that note, I'd like to give the final word on Global Warming to our friends the Canadians. Well, a picture more than a word:

Brad Templeton, a Chairmen of the Board of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (which I tend to agree with more often than not, though is wrong sometimes), was having fun with photoshop, and this picture really made me laugh. You can see Brad's website at http://www.templetons.com/brad/.

P.S. I have to apologize to all you ultra-conservatives out there for my "liberal" use of language in this post. Global Warming really makes me angry, and sometimes I just lose control and the expletives fly. I shall be more restrained in the future.