Angry Conservative > Home ( DNN 4.3.5 ) - Global Warming, where for art thou?!? Coldest it's been in 100 years!

Location: Blogs Angry Conservative
Posted by: Angry Conservative	2/25/2008 10:20 AM
The National Post is reporting that snowfall in North America, Siberia, Mongolia and China has been the greatest since 1966, and many American cities are colder than all of the 20th century. Forget global warming: Welcome to the new Ice Age The article is fascinating, a recount of facts about major cooling events around the globe, startling when you consider the rhetoric around Global Warming (which the media is conveniently trying change the term to climate change so that they can blame cold and cooling trends on Global Warming). Shouldn't we be able to throw away our coats soon and all live in our shorts during the winter? Here's an interesting quote: According to Robert Toggweiler of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory at Princeton University and Joellen Russell, assistant professor of biogeochemical dynamics at the University of Arizona -- two prominent climate modellers -- the computer models that show polar ice-melt cooling the oceans, stopping the circulation of warm equatorial water to northern latitudes and triggering another Ice Age (a la the movie The Day After Tomorrow) are all wrong. And if you don't believe me, look at what Wikepedia has to say about Global Cooling.The scare that was in the 70s will come back in the 2010, and we're just experiencing the tip of the iceberg (no pun intended).

Permalink \| Trackback

Comments (1) Add Comment

Re: Global Warming, where for art thou?!? Coldest it's been in 100 years!

By Angelos Backus on 1/30/2010 8:42 AM

GLOBAL WARMING OR CLIMATE CHANGE?
By Angelos Backus

My article “Global warming or global cooling?”intimidated many of Al Gore's Kool-aid drinkers to rephrase their theme “Global Warming” to “Climate change”. Changing the name of their theme doesn't meant that they changed their thinking. Their new theme relates to their initiatives of wind power, and electric automobiles. Ironically, these initiatives will be the cause of climate change!

In accordance with the first law of thermal dynamics, energy can not be created or destroyed. However, energy can be converted to another form. It is this unwariness of energy conservation by Al Gore and his uninformed followers that has perpetuated the alarmist notion of “global warming”.

Let's analyze wind power...
Wind is created by the potential difference of two or more atmospheric area conditions. One area being under the influence of low pressure, and the other under the influence of higher pressure. Furthermore, in accordance with the second law of thermal dynamics, energy moves from high to low levels until it reaches equilibrium. This is a natural climatic condition, caused by the planets geographic and oceanographic composition. These happenings are vital in maintaining the Earth's climatic conditions.

Let's analyze windmills...
A typical windmill is made up by an electric producing generator powered by three attached metal blades that are as big as a large size tour bus. By attempting to visualize the movement of three buses, one could imagine how much energy would be required. The amount of foot pound of wind energy will be converted to kinetic energy, and only 75% of that can be converted to electrical energy. That converted energy is no longer wind power, therefore, we have detracted the amount needed to fulfill the natural wind movement determined by the potential difference. This obstruction will cause a man-made undetermined climatic condition. This may alter the established natural habitat and geographic evolution in specific areas.

Example:
By hanging a piece of tissue about (5) five feet away and letting out a blast of air, we can see that we can easily make the tissue move. Again we are going to repeat the above steps, but this time we will attempt to move the tissue at the same time as spinning a paper or plastic wind mill with the same blast of air. Much of our wind power was consumed by the wind mill, and the tissue had less movement, if any.

Now, lets talk about electric powered automobiles...

We keep hearing how electric powered automobiles will decrease pollution, and save energy.
Here again, the laws of conservation of energy have been ignored.
Question number one:
From what form of energy was electrical energy converted?
Fossil fuel? Nuclear? Or what? No matter from the energy source, we can never harvest 100% of the original potential energy. A minimum of 25% will be wasted during transformation, storage, and transportation (remember the other law “nothing is free!'). How about the expense and the effects of pollution from the implementation of construction, production, conversion, transportation, and storage of the potential electric energy? How can we then say that the electric powered transportation vehicle will be more efficient and more “environmentally friendly”?

Question number two:
What are we going to do with the solid, and extremely toxic chemical waste of batteries, isolation materials, cables, and the additional necessary contributing metals (copper, aluminum etc.) and lacquers? Aren't our landfills at a catastrophic limit already?

Your name:
Title:
Comment:

Add Comment Cancel